
Here is how to spot five common tricks used in COVID-19 misinformation, from cherry-picking data to shifting definitions, with clear examples and science-based tips to protect yourself from false claims. This guide highlights how to recognise and reject persuasive but misleading pandemic narratives and Bad COVID-19 Claims.
Science vs. Misinformation
Science can withstand scrutiny: it is transparent, peer-reviewed, and converges across independent lines of evidence. Misinformation often borrows the look of credibility — official colours, government-style layout, data charts — but relies on rhetorical tricks, cherry-picked facts, and unverified claims to mislead. Once you can spot the patterns, they lose their power. Like lipstick on a pig, when you see it, you cannot unsee it.
Polishing a turd
Some publications — styled to look like official inquiries — present themselves as “what really happened” accounts of the pandemic. They can feel persuasive before you’ve even read them because they use the same cognitive shortcuts we use to judge trustworthiness in legitimate science.
5 Tactics to Watch For
A real-world cautionary tale
In 2023, a study tested how easily people could be swayed by a professional-looking COVID-19 misinformation report shared on Facebook. Even among those with university degrees, a third believed false vaccine claims when they were embedded in a glossy PDF. The layout, not the content, did most of the persuading. This “illusion of authority” works because we shortcut trust to visual markers like formatting, logos, and charts — a mental habit that bad actors exploit.
Further reading
- Debunking Handbook 2020 – Lewandowsky et al.
- van Prooijen & Douglas, 2018 – Conspiracy Theories as Part of Human Nature
Discover more from
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

